1) There was no prior agreement and no conditions. There was an ask, there was not an agreement
-
-
I would like to stop tweeting about this but apparently I'm the last person on the internet who can read
Afficher cette discussion -
Now please stop @-ing me with random lies or misconceptions you've swallowed whole or going full epistemological uncertainty about whether or not some detail that you can't even pin down is gonna get someone vanned in China (it won't, let it go, it won't)
Afficher cette discussion
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
It wasn't okay for Sarah to ask, but you are absolutely right that Naomi should have just declined comment and said that it wasn't okay to ask. I *wish* I'd seen that email months ago, and would have given her very different advice had I known exactly what was she was asked.
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
Is publishing emails considered the high road? Honestly the article is great outside these graphs, I don't understand the purpose of including them unless it's to participate in the beef for no discernable reason.
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
For as many times as you want, she didn’t change her stance in it or authorize him to publish what she previously asked him not to publish. Agreeing to discuss it doesn’t imply agreeing to publish it & she explicitly told him not to publish from the beginning.
-
Interview subjects don't get to "authorize" anything
-
So why did the author agree to her "conditions" before the interview if he wasn't committed to them ? Are you saying he was misleading her and lying to her on purpose to get his interview ?
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
why should people be asked to comment on a conspiracy theory? I believe we can both agree that is not journalism, but gossiping.
-
I wonder if Vice would ask Obama about the birther 'controversy'?
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
Where’s her answer?
- 1 réponse de plus
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
Read your story. You mentioned a " fact-checker reached out to other sources"? She probably thought you were checking her for lying like Dougherty had done. Maybe thought you were baiting her then turning it into a hit piece. That's the only way her reaction makes sense.
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.