girl you tried to justify doxing someone by saying "well he could have just replied to my email asking if there were any children at his home address I need to be worried about"https://twitter.com/RealSexyCyborg/status/982113161707843596 …
-
-
3) there is no big reveal in the Vice piece that gives attention to an internet conspiracy theory that hasn't ever before been seen in the media.
Afficher cette discussion -
4) November 2017: https://www.buzzfeed.com/kassycho/a-male-ceo-has-apologized-after-saying-that-this-female …pic.twitter.com/mD2V0UyUv8
Afficher cette discussion -
Engaging in both-sidesism on this is playing into what is now quite obviously just a sustained online harassment campaign masked by misdirection
Afficher cette discussion -
The world is a big place full of complicated things and this isn't one of them.
Afficher cette discussion -
Beefing on Twitter with subjects looks bad. Publications prefer to take the high road, and other journalists try to stay out of it. Honestly I'm only at this point because she literally admitted to emailing a threat and people are still out here going "well on the other hand"
Afficher cette discussion -
-
The relevant email is reproduced in the article, which you did not read, but should, because reading is good https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/3kjqdb/naomi-wu-sexy-cyborg-profile-shenzhen-maker-scene …https://twitter.com/PacoBell/status/982292582054019072 …
Afficher cette discussion -
-
I would like to stop tweeting about this but apparently I'm the last person on the internet who can read
Afficher cette discussion -
Now please stop @-ing me with random lies or misconceptions you've swallowed whole or going full epistemological uncertainty about whether or not some detail that you can't even pin down is gonna get someone vanned in China (it won't, let it go, it won't)
Afficher cette discussion
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
You’ve been very level headed in these threads, appreciate your POV. I’d like to point out that Naomi said even Buzzfeed respected her “privacy.” But ……..pic.twitter.com/fsTpl2gklz
-
In November, several months before Vice published, Buzzfeed went into detail about the “conspiracy” and rumors that Naomi was backed by a western guy. It even published a photo of her with a white guy!pic.twitter.com/pgQLkymsr9
-
So the “safety” explanation is BS, because Buzzfeed went into far more detail than what Vice did. The only explanation I can think of is Vice apparently contacted her associates to verify details of the story (i.e. what you need to do when you report), and she didn’t like that.
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
Not to mention that she was perfectly willing to address these ugly stories with media in the past without presumably going on a doxing rampage.http://www.sixthtone.com/news/1001396/how-naomi-wu-wants-to-change-the-tech-scenes-sexist-wiring …
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
They did that after everything was publicized
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
Nice to see you supporting a vulnerable woman who has been victimized by the media for profit. Posting someone’s personal details is the same thing they did to her, as far as most are concerned posting already publicly available information is not “doxxing.”
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.