girl you tried to justify doxing someone by saying "well he could have just replied to my email asking if there were any children at his home address I need to be worried about"https://twitter.com/RealSexyCyborg/status/982113161707843596 …
-
-
1) There was no prior agreement and no conditions. There was an ask, there was not an agreement
Afficher cette discussion -
2) When you ask a source BEHIND THE SCENES, WITHOUT PUBLISHING ANYTHING about something they are uncomfortable with, the thing the source does is decline and possibly off the record explain why they're no-commenting.
Afficher cette discussion -
The source does not, typically, go to Twitter war to publicize the exact thing that they don't want to talk about
Afficher cette discussion -
3) there is no big reveal in the Vice piece that gives attention to an internet conspiracy theory that hasn't ever before been seen in the media.
Afficher cette discussion -
4) November 2017: https://www.buzzfeed.com/kassycho/a-male-ceo-has-apologized-after-saying-that-this-female …pic.twitter.com/mD2V0UyUv8
Afficher cette discussion -
Engaging in both-sidesism on this is playing into what is now quite obviously just a sustained online harassment campaign masked by misdirection
Afficher cette discussion -
The world is a big place full of complicated things and this isn't one of them.
Afficher cette discussion -
Beefing on Twitter with subjects looks bad. Publications prefer to take the high road, and other journalists try to stay out of it. Honestly I'm only at this point because she literally admitted to emailing a threat and people are still out here going "well on the other hand"
Afficher cette discussion -
-
The relevant email is reproduced in the article, which you did not read, but should, because reading is good https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/3kjqdb/naomi-wu-sexy-cyborg-profile-shenzhen-maker-scene …https://twitter.com/PacoBell/status/982292582054019072 …
Afficher cette discussion -
-
I would like to stop tweeting about this but apparently I'm the last person on the internet who can read
Afficher cette discussion -
Now please stop @-ing me with random lies or misconceptions you've swallowed whole or going full epistemological uncertainty about whether or not some detail that you can't even pin down is gonna get someone vanned in China (it won't, let it go, it won't)
Afficher cette discussion
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
fwiw, i really respect you, and i agree with a lot of your points—my intent was to add context that most people lack, not justify the doxxing, but i’m not sure how effective that was, and i get why you take issue with it. i’m sorry your mentions are (i assume) trash.
-
Yep, I get what you were doing but it's not helpful to lay out an authoritative timeline by taking certain facts as granted when they are in fact not supported or contradicted by what's out there. And to be fair, almost everyone online has been doing it ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
Thats genuinely really sad that you would dismiss this post. Please try to settle this situation rather than exacerbate it. Jackie's post attempts to build bridges and educate. You can write 100 posts on why doxing is wrong, still that doesn't settle anything.
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.