The author doesn't mention her husband's name or really get at the substance of the online conspiracy theory about her relationship, in fact if you've been following any of her very public reaction, the piece limits itself to a necessary acknowledgment of what's happening online
-
-
And important note, the piece never specifies she has a white husband, you brought it up first, nice going
Afficher cette discussion -
She has been talking about it for months and harassing journalists, inciting doxing, and then actual doxing. This is a nonsensical attitude.https://twitter.com/superruserr/status/981577086451138560 …
Afficher cette discussion -
-
Journalists are not your personal PR lackeys. If the people tweeting nonsense at me actually read more, they'd know what a profile is and how it works.
Afficher cette discussion -
There's a difference between (1) publishing something that briefly mentions the existence of a significant other after a months-long tweetstorm that also acknowledges it, and previous acknowledgments in other media
Afficher cette discussion -
(2) emailing someone "is this your address and are there children in your home?" and then publishing said addresspic.twitter.com/yTbKxqfgPA
Afficher cette discussion -
"Well if he didn't want to get doxed he should have responded to my email asking if there are kids in his home" IS NOT A DEFENSE and not even on the same PLANET as what Vice printed, which again, you should actually read, because reading is good
Afficher cette discussion -
There's plenty of sensible people who have been sliding into my DMs because they're afraid to disagree with this person in public or feel like it's punching down. I think at this point what's been done is blatantly abusive and should be acknowledged as such.
Afficher cette discussion -
This is an absolutely insane take and it's abusive thinking https://twitter.com/gellenburg/status/981944000608440322 …
Ce Tweet est indisponible.Afficher cette discussion -
There is nothing complicated about this internet kerfuffle. Someone here is in the wrong and it's not Vice.
Afficher cette discussion -
"verify that there are children in the home" -- if you're focused on anything else you're buying into an abusive derail of what harm was actually caused here and what kind of accountability is called for.
Afficher cette discussion
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
The fact that you are going on about a topic that you know she does not want to talk about in the first place indicates that you really are only posting this to protect your journalist friends and say nice things about your previous workplace.
-
Almost like this is the exact situation she wanted to avoid in the first place. But it was ‘necessary’ to bring it up because there were rumours on reddit? Sorry, doesn’t wash.
-
Yes. Not necessary. Here's one from
@verge that would rather continue gossiping. And while people can make up their own mind, the only group that consistently side with the continuing gossip/rumor meandering are the very same involved in it. I'm not talking about journalists btw.
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
That’s not a valid conclusion. “A ton” +
@RealSexyCyborg claiming something, then you asking a friend who said “China it’s like Korea” boom case closed everyone’s wrong my opinion is right. -
Sarah: "everyone is gullible" "Twitterstorm", name drops "white supremacy", asks rando her opinion of relationships and claims case closed, end discussion. Motivation? "I've worked with them they are nice, end discussion". She was about "let's fight Reddit conspirators" until now
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
i for one would not be comfortable judging someone's threat model based on how a 3rd party described it
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
Not sure that checking with ‘a Chinese National’ (one?) is really doing your due diligence.
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
If there is no cultural sensitivity here, there certainly is a political one, one that is way different from South Korea. Would you post details about a person from DPRK? Because it's closer to this in China. I will illustrate...
-
Simple example: Chinese people's social credit score (a government program) can prevent them from getting loans, jobs, prevent them from buying plane and train tickets (effectively limiting their ability to travel, and visit family) ...
-
This is merely the social credit score, a score that is for example based on whether you went through a red pedestrian light, maintained by hundreds of thousands of cameras linked to facial recognition software.
-
Now, if they do this for something fairly innocuous as crossing a red pedestrian light, imagine the consequences of actions that might be deemed more sensitive...
-
Let me ask you this: If a colleague would put, say, a Mexican woman in danger by revealing information that could lead to a cartel going after her, would you be equally supportive of your colleague?
-
To make it clear, it's an analogy, not a comparison of the government to cartels... nor an equation of the actions either group would enact as punishment so to say.
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.