The author is a woman of color. The profile is incredibly sympathetic and continues to cast the subject in a positive light despite acknowledging the angry Twitterstorm.
-
-
I don't have special knowledge into the decision-making here. I just know it's what I would have done if I failed to de-escalate privately.
Afficher cette discussion -
And with the buzz over the forthcoming piece it would have felt wrong not to mention what was happening on Twitter, especially with her Twitter account being a big part of her online persona. The way it is written is also how I would have handled it.
Afficher cette discussion -
There's a ton of white men telling me that there's a cultural sensitivity issue here or that it's dangerous (lol) to have a white husband. I did a sanity check with a woman who's a Chinese national. It's not far off from Korean culture: this is a non-issue, y'all are gullible
Afficher cette discussion -
And important note, the piece never specifies she has a white husband, you brought it up first, nice going
Afficher cette discussion -
She has been talking about it for months and harassing journalists, inciting doxing, and then actual doxing. This is a nonsensical attitude.https://twitter.com/superruserr/status/981577086451138560 …
Afficher cette discussion -
-
Journalists are not your personal PR lackeys. If the people tweeting nonsense at me actually read more, they'd know what a profile is and how it works.
Afficher cette discussion -
There's a difference between (1) publishing something that briefly mentions the existence of a significant other after a months-long tweetstorm that also acknowledges it, and previous acknowledgments in other media
Afficher cette discussion -
(2) emailing someone "is this your address and are there children in your home?" and then publishing said addresspic.twitter.com/yTbKxqfgPA
Afficher cette discussion -
"Well if he didn't want to get doxed he should have responded to my email asking if there are kids in his home" IS NOT A DEFENSE and not even on the same PLANET as what Vice printed, which again, you should actually read, because reading is good
Afficher cette discussion -
There's plenty of sensible people who have been sliding into my DMs because they're afraid to disagree with this person in public or feel like it's punching down. I think at this point what's been done is blatantly abusive and should be acknowledged as such.
Afficher cette discussion -
This is an absolutely insane take and it's abusive thinking https://twitter.com/gellenburg/status/981944000608440322 …
Ce Tweet est indisponible.Afficher cette discussion -
There is nothing complicated about this internet kerfuffle. Someone here is in the wrong and it's not Vice.
Afficher cette discussion -
"verify that there are children in the home" -- if you're focused on anything else you're buying into an abusive derail of what harm was actually caused here and what kind of accountability is called for.
Afficher cette discussion
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
In the end here I think I agree
@RealSexyCyborg kind of lost the fight if attempting any “retaliatory”#dox action. Now,@vice apparently has a sucky editorial policy of prohibiting previews, and if it wasn’t for that I think this whole scene could’ve been avoided.Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.