this case is NOT boring nilay
well, you'd think her observation would count double for copyright cases, since the federal circuit only reviews copyright claims in incidental cases???
-
-
I expect the opposite actually. Ask why the Fed Cir got jurisdiction over patents & not other IP? Anecdotally, b/c normal judges enjoy (C) & TM cases, they're intellectually fun & high-stakes, and unlike technical patents "I can understand and JUDGE this".
-
The other courts *didn't want* the fragmented complex quagmire of pre-1982 patent law, and lobbied to keep the understandable (C) & TM cases. O'Malley, being a former D.Ct. judge, seems to have that high opinion of her ability to judge (C).
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.