Jury has been excused so that they can figure out what's going on with the technical issues with projection. Alsup has called all the technicians and says "no games are going to be played" and that both sides need to cooperate and work together promptly
-
Afficher cette discussion
-
He says there's too much of a delay between saying they're going to show a depo and the depo showing. "45 seconds is too long. It has to be 1 second."
4 réponses 0 Retweet 19 j'aimeAfficher cette discussion -
(I'm not sure the parties were actually messing with each other by being slow about the slides & projections during the proceedings, I think it's just normal A/V difficulties)
5 réponses 0 Retweet 20 j'aimeAfficher cette discussion -
Uber wants to show the side-by-side exhibits (the Gorilla circuits email and the '96 patent) that were withheld from the public.
1 réponse 1 Retweet 13 j'aimeAfficher cette discussion -
Remember I said we were finally seeing a glimpse of the trade secrets? I was wrong. This was about a patent claim that *isn't in play anymore*.
1 réponse 2 Retweets 23 j'aimeAfficher cette discussion -
Alsup admonishes them for being so cagey about the Gorilla Circuits schematic. ALSUP: Even though ‘96 got thrown into oblivion, you’re still trying to screw it into place. It doesn’t have anything to do with any of the trade secrets.
1 réponse 0 Retweet 18 j'aimeAfficher cette discussion -
Uber presses for the exhibit to be made public, Alsup denies and says they should see how the case plays out first.
1 réponse 0 Retweet 13 j'aimeAfficher cette discussion -
Wow, Waymo's case is... .... messy.
2 réponses 0 Retweet 41 j'aimeAfficher cette discussion -
They're four witnesses in and there's been like 30 minutes of sealed direct testimony on the trade secrets. The most technical they've gotten in the public portion was just now, and the judge says it's about a patent that was thrown out.
2 réponses 0 Retweet 16 j'aimeAfficher cette discussion -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
I understand why Uber wants to go after the patent. If they can show that the design is the same as the patent, then it'd not a trade secret.
1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime
Yeah, but Waymo is pursuing it. Hard.
-
-
En réponse à @sarahjeong
John-Mark Gurney 🗑️ 🔥 a retweeté sarah jeong
Maybe they are trying to show the differences? If User's design is more similar to their internal design that isn't the same as patent. That shows stealing the trade secret.https://twitter.com/sarahjeong/status/960950541378465792 …
John-Mark Gurney 🗑️ 🔥 ajouté,
sarah jeong @sarahjeongOn redirect Waymo asks witness if there are differences between the patent and the trade secret spec. Grossman says: - Structure is not uniform, in the patent it’s much more uniform. - Angles of the edges are very specific and there’s a flow, angles are all the same on patent.Afficher cette discussion0 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aimeMerci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.