It's possible that Levandowski represents everything that Silicon Valley workers hate about their own workplaces.
-
Afficher cette discussion
-
UBER: Counsel talks about sensational emails -- of course they’re going to talk about that because they don’t want to talk about the technology.
1 réponse 0 Retweet 19 j'aimeAfficher cette discussion -
E - M A I L S
1 réponse 2 Retweets 95 j'aimeAfficher cette discussion -
LMAO Uber's case really is that Levandowski is a useless piece of shit
2 réponses 24 Retweets 162 j'aimeAfficher cette discussion -
2011 email from David Lawee: "As Google I suppose I am prepared to take the risk with Anthony, but I can say, definitively, that if I was choosing a business partner to start a company with, there is no way in hell I would proceed."
1 réponse 1 Retweet 17 j'aimeAfficher cette discussion -
Levandowski, says Uber, "has a pattern of surprising… unusual behavior…"
1 réponse 1 Retweet 13 j'aimeAfficher cette discussion -
Google retained AL despite “early warning signs that he wasn’t trustworthy." Ultimately Uber fired AL.
1 réponse 1 Retweet 18 j'aimeAfficher cette discussion -
Uber emphasizes that engineering skills and talents and publicly known ideas are different from trade secrets, that engineers should be allowed to move from company to company with their talent.
1 réponse 1 Retweet 15 j'aimeAfficher cette discussion -
Uber is done with the public part of their testimony. We're now proceeding to the nonpublic part of opening statements.
4 réponses 0 Retweet 11 j'aimeAfficher cette discussion -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
Is this going to be a pattern for the trial? Will there be public/nonpublic portions e.g. of direct and cross examinations?
1 réponse 0 Retweet 1 j'aime
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.