"He'll be kept on payroll, somewhere."https://lexgill.com/2016/06/06/three-hundred-and-twenty-four/ …
-
-
Afficher cette discussion
-
Ha ha ha ahhahaha hah aha haaaa ... sure https://twitter.com/_r_y_a_n__/status/943622024223690752 …
Ce Tweet est indisponible.Afficher cette discussion
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
“In a statement, Mr. Baquet said the company had completed its inquiry and found that Mr. Thrush had ‘behaved in ways that we do not condone.’” This doesn’t make any sense. By keeping him, aren’t they condoning it (at least to some degree)? Bad writing/editing at the NYT...
-
Baquet ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
-
I think he should go, but the idea that the paper gets the benefit of claiming to care about harassment in its ranks while keeping him is so factually false that it’s an insult to our intelligence to claim that they don’t condone it.
-
The whole thing is Bad! It makes absolutely no sense to move him from White House reporting, the problem wasn't that he was reporting on the White House
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
What kind of counseling does one get for "misogyny"?
-
I believe the current preferred treatment is no supervisory responsibility and an all female reporting chain but I don't think the times is equipped to offer that.
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
Taking a page from the Catholic Church on this one, apparently.
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
Are there media companies that don't protect and enable sexual predators?
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.