This seems a little six-degreesy. I’d assume indirect links like this are pretty common.https://twitter.com/noamscheiber/status/913458610382008321 …
-
Afficher cette discussion
-
How many groups that would want a SCOTUS justice to speak get funding from foundations that also donate to, say, ACLU?
1 réponse 0 Retweet 2 j'aimeAfficher cette discussion -
I’d think you’d be harder pressed to find cases where you COULDN’T draw a second degree link from a donor to a litigant.
2 réponses 0 Retweet 3 j'aimeAfficher cette discussion -
En réponse à @normative
The corporate structuring / staffing of / consulting for foundations makes it complicated too
1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong @normative
It doesn't mean there *isn't* anything sketchy going on, just that there's too much noise to pick up signals
1 réponse 0 Retweet 1 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong @normative
One might even posit that that this thicket of structures has sprung up on purpose!
1 réponse 0 Retweet 2 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
On the list of ways improper infuence could be exerted on Justices, stuff like this seems like awfully small beer.
1 réponse 0 Retweet 2 j'aime
agree. stuff like this probably has more of an effect through other avenues, justices just get touched by it as a side effect
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.