In internet sex panics, there is always a victim of the internet. In the 90s it was a child who sees porn, which today seems quaint.
-
Afficher cette discussion
-
As time passes, there will be things about the anti-sex trafficking complex that the mainstream will come to realize as quite complicated
2 réponses 4 Retweets 12 j'aimeAfficher cette discussion -
But it might take decades, and what comes out of Congress will likely not be as obviously clumsy and ripe for litigation as the CDA of 1996
1 réponse 2 Retweets 9 j'aimeAfficher cette discussion -
Meanwhile, sex workers are going to get thrown under the bus. But what else is new?
1 réponse 5 Retweets 13 j'aimeAfficher cette discussion -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
Do you have sense of how broad the rules will be interpreted? Will anything but minor vanilla sexuality discussion be banned for liability?
1 réponse 0 Retweet 1 j'aime -
En réponse à @wwahammy
if enough leeway is given to the states, we don't know what the states will come up with--
1 réponse 1 Retweet 4 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong @wwahammy
however I imagine that part of the bill will be narrowed down so that the relevant state law must very closely reflect the federal law?
1 réponse 1 Retweet 4 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong @wwahammy
BUT the thing is that any requirement to prescreen or proactively monitor means that the service is only incentivized to ratchet higher
2 réponses 1 Retweet 6 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong @wwahammy
note, for example, google or twitch's overaggressive monitoring of potential copyright infringement, etc etc
1 réponse 1 Retweet 5 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong @wwahammy
which, btw! they aren't even required under law to implement things like content ID!
1 réponse 1 Retweet 6 j'aime
imagine how much more aggressive it gets once there's an actual legal requirement
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.