SESTA is totally going to pass
-
-
I think what we're going to see is a return to the timeline where ACLU v. Reno went the other way
1 réponse 4 Retweets 13 j'aimeAfficher cette discussion -
I doubt this will impact the bottom line of major companies in a way they can't actually handle. The real impact will be on consumers.
9 réponses 2 Retweets 17 j'aimeAfficher cette discussion -
I wrote this a year ago: https://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2016/08/19/how-panics-about-naked-pictures-of-women-shaped-the-web-as-we-know-it/ …pic.twitter.com/tuKYVt2KwY
9 réponses 102 Retweets 192 j'aimeAfficher cette discussion -
Notably, the senate committee did not and will likely never address the conflation of sex trafficking and sex work in practice
1 réponse 11 Retweets 25 j'aimeAfficher cette discussion -
In the 90s, sex work was demonized as pure depravity, in the 2010s it is erased as pure exploitation
2 réponses 6 Retweets 25 j'aimeAfficher cette discussion -
In internet sex panics, there is always a victim of the internet. In the 90s it was a child who sees porn, which today seems quaint.
2 réponses 6 Retweets 22 j'aimeAfficher cette discussion -
As time passes, there will be things about the anti-sex trafficking complex that the mainstream will come to realize as quite complicated
2 réponses 4 Retweets 12 j'aimeAfficher cette discussion
But it might take decades, and what comes out of Congress will likely not be as obviously clumsy and ripe for litigation as the CDA of 1996
-
-
Meanwhile, sex workers are going to get thrown under the bus. But what else is new?
1 réponse 5 Retweets 13 j'aimeAfficher cette discussionMerci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.