I haven't looked at the docket but this news story about Google resisting handing over salary records seems like a standard objection
-
-
Some firm should just hire me to analyze their motions practice for potentially bad headlines
-
Or maybe media could hire people who knew what legal stuff meant.
-
Well I'm already doing the one job
-
Can't you just edit all the media and yell at them
-
Standard. "Proportionality" is new hotness among corporate lawyers per Rule 26 changes. Still dumb for GOOGLE to say they suck at databases.
-
Oh absolutely. Struck me as rote lawyering turned into a PR foul, not malice or a guilty conscience
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
It's so ridiculous though. $100k? For Google?
-
Oh yeah it's ridiculous but it was probably just a rote objection that would have been malpractice not to make
-
Tbc I haven't looked at the docket, this is just my guess
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
And they're going way hard into it, calling the demands prima facie unconstitutional.
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
Possibly. it lowballs the cost--in practice it's not only cost of assembling info but of raising salaries once the info is public.
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
Probably, but it's pretty pathetic of they want to claim that counts.
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
People all "Well gosh doesn't the government already have that data" in defense.
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.