The anonymous officials said that based on clues Trump gave, Russia *could* identify sources and methodspic.twitter.com/YTPDjzeyku
Vous pouvez ajouter des informations de localisation à vos Tweets, comme votre ville ou votre localisation précise, depuis le Web et via des applications tierces. Vous avez toujours la possibilité de supprimer l'historique de localisation de vos Tweets. En savoir plus
The anonymous officials said that based on clues Trump gave, Russia *could* identify sources and methodspic.twitter.com/YTPDjzeyku
McMaster either didn't read the article or is responding to a strawman version of it.https://twitter.com/BraddJaffy/status/864257709830529024 …
He says that "as reported" it's false, but he won't directly contradict any of the actual claims made in it.
Tillerson and McMaster both issued non-denial denials. Leaving Dina Powell as the odd one outhttps://twitter.com/kyledcheney/status/864248406298021888 …
In fact, it is so similar it is clear he is choosing his words *very* carefully.
the take away will be that most believe the simple story that trump told russia everything, a smaller group will think trump said nothing
Because the article was updated with McMaster's statement, correct?
Non-denial denial. We've reached peak Nixon.
McMaster said the report is false. Suggest you look up "contradict"
Where's the proof any of it is true? Why should he have to refute lies? "When did you stop beating your wife. Provide proof."
Except the part where he said the story is false.
Except for the wee bit: "I was in the room, it didn't happen" refuting the entire article.
"It" can just mean everything he specifically stated.
HR you have or had a reputation depending on these 24 hrs. Resign if they pressure or trick you into untruths
and an even smaller group can explain why that is bullshit
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.