This, I would agree with? The previous 9th decision is procedurally very awkward.
-
-
I haven't updated in a hot minute (I will soon! I will!) but I also have a newsletter about the airport cases http://tinyletter.com/airports/archive …
-
If you're a layperson who wants to understand these cases better, some of these old newsletters will help.
-
This covers some procedural ground, like what the fuck is an en banc and a circuit, and what is a TRO / injunction http://tinyletter.com/airports/letters/record-scratch-yup-that-s-me-the-airport-cases-episode-1 …
-
Here is an explanation of the Establishment Clause in this case http://tinyletter.com/airports/letters/i-don-t-practice-santeria-the-airport-cases-episode-5 …
-
And here I explain the Hawaii TRO that just came up to the 9th today http://tinyletter.com/airports/letters/we-all-know-what-that-means-the-airport-cases-episode-7 …
-
Still shaking my head marveling at Katyal's deft dual-wield of "The president doesn't respect the judiciary" and "Preserve the status quo"
-
The two things judges love the most: their own power, and having no real impact on the existing law
-
what an incredible double-tap
- 2 réponses de plus
Nouvelle conversation -
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.