An interesting question, that the lawyer cannot navigate
-
-
En réponse à @sarahjeong
Lol lawyer brings up the statement about the Muslim ban on the website. "He hasn't removed the statement on the website"
1 réponse 14 Retweets 66 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
Judge: "Still there today?" Lawyer: "Last I checked, yes"
3 réponses 3 Retweets 15 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
Judge Niemeyer asks if they're going to look for statements from 20 years ago
1 réponse 1 Retweet 5 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
another judge interrupts to say they're only looking for relevant and probative statements, seemingly intervening out of pity
3 réponses 1 Retweet 23 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
Judge Shedd: If the number of affected people are less than 10% of all Muslims, is that still a ban on Muslims
1 réponse 1 Retweet 6 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
Judge Diaz: How long does this taint last? Jadwat (lawyer) demurs, doesn't really answer, seems like he could cite to McCreary tho
1 réponse 0 Retweet 5 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
There's even a note in the lower court decision that covers this
1 réponse 0 Retweet 4 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
Judge Niemeyer says very crankily, "Stick with the hypothetical!"
4 réponses 0 Retweet 6 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
This is a game of What-You-Don't-Want-To-Hear-From-The-Panel bingo isn't it
1 réponse 0 Retweet 2 j'aime
They don't even hate his argument that much, he's just really bad at making it!!!!!!!
-
-
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.