Judge Shedd: "Your argument is that he is tainted by animus, is that correct?"
-
-
Judge King asks what would happen if the president repudiated all of his statements. Judge Shedd: Would it change the result at all?
-
Jadwat: A simple repudiation wouldn't do it. Judge Shedd: What if he said he was sorry every day for a year? Laughter in the courtroom
-
(Jadwat says no, because that's not how the Est Clause works)
-
A judge chimed in to bring up that McCreary note I thought of before :|
-
Still struggling with nerves, I think, but Jadwat did manage to land a line about seeing that anything is left of the Establishment Clause
-
I think that's really key here to assuaging judges' concerns about stepping all over the executive.
-
Now onto rebuttal. Briefing matters more but holy shit that went so poorly
-
I want to take solace in how much that is true, but the old saw is that you can't win a case at oral argument but you can lose one
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
This is a game of What-You-Don't-Want-To-Hear-From-The-Panel bingo isn't it
-
They don't even hate his argument that much, he's just really bad at making it!!!!!!!
- 1 réponse de plus
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
Never good when the judge says that!
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
oh god it's 1L all over again "NEVER FIGHT THE HYPO"
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.