Judge: Has the president ever repudiated what he's said about the Muslim ban? Wall: He has.
-
-
En réponse à @sarahjeong
Judges now chiming in saying he's changed what he's said but never repudiated. Judge: It's still on his website!
2 réponses 4 Retweets 24 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
*Ron Howard voice*: It was not still on his website.
5 réponses 2 Retweets 62 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
(Wall does not appear to know that the statement has been deleted off the website)
3 réponses 2 Retweets 15 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
We'll get more clarity into how the en banc panel is feeling about the case when the plaintiffs argue, but right now they seem quite hostile
1 réponse 2 Retweets 8 j'aime -
-
En réponse à @sarahjeong
Oddly getting bogged down in whether nationals of 7 countries would be detrimental to nat sec of US under 1182(f)
1 réponse 0 Retweet 4 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
Wall definitely trying to push that it's all campaign statements but that's not true and the judges don't seem to be buying it.
2 réponses 4 Retweets 16 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
Wall says that when the president signed the EO, read the title "Preventing Terrorist Entry in the US" and said "We all know what the means"
2 réponses 1 Retweet 14 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
... that the courts can interpret that as meaning that it was a Muslim ban, because they are obliged to give him the most generous reading
2 réponses 0 Retweet 9 j'aime
Sorry, that should be *CAN'T, autocorrect is killing me
-
-
En réponse à @sarahjeong
Most of us (even those of us who didn't go to law school) knew what you meant. Autocorrect is just evil. It Is Know.
0 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aimeMerci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.