what
-
-
ah - i thought lexmark was about restricting the rights of purchasers to freely use what they bought (refilling cartridges etc.)
-
oh I thought you were referring to the current lexmark case at scotus. the 2014 decision was on lanham act grounds
-
the really blood boiling bits of the lawsuit had since dropped out over the course of the litigation
-
i must have read an old article last week. i thought the cartridges case was just argued or something
-
nevermind. i think i see what i misinterpreted about what i read. john deere can't preclude aftermarket hacks so it's different.
-
also, i didn't say this last night but i hope lexmark loses and monsanto shits their pants
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.