what's even the point of discoverypic.twitter.com/6cQpIxC2NO
Vous pouvez ajouter des informations de localisation à vos Tweets, comme votre ville ou votre localisation précise, depuis le Web et via des applications tierces. Vous avez toujours la possibilité de supprimer l'historique de localisation de vos Tweets. En savoir plus
non-lulzy observation— court mostly adopts standing analysis from 9th Cir Washington v. Trump, but also notes drop in tourism dollarspic.twitter.com/pWTyjP397e
The airport cases are pushing against existing caselaw, because the evidentiary record is simply too stupid to ignore.
With all due respect to @Quinnae_Moon, I dissent from this analysis.https://twitter.com/Quinnae_Moon/status/842151571588825088 …
The existing case law encourages the courts to ignore the trollish statements and dogwhistling/actual-whistling of this administration.
It is not a fundamental characteristic of the law or the judiciary to use fascistic play with language against an administration.
It in fact goes against the case law on executive power and immigration.
What's happening here is that the situation is too fucking stupid for the courts to be able to bear to mindlessly apply the old rules.
It is *absolutely* plausible that the challengers will ultimately lose in the airport cases.
But I think it would be an enormous blow to the dignity of the judiciary, and my sense is that a lot of judges feel that way too.
It's a little too perfect that DOJ and supporters like Judge Bybee say the courts cannot look "behind the curtain."
PAY NO ATTENTION TO THE DISCRIMINATORY INTENT BEHIND THE CURTAINpic.twitter.com/TiPINiCS4U
"before the toughness" is an amazing quote
“pour in before the toughness”
total dumbshits
And he's saying that he really wants to go back to the first ban... on stage... tonight... AFTER this ruling!!!
Nailed it!
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.