why are only two(?) of those against the federal government almost all of them are against trump, specifically
-
-
En réponse à @anthonypants
i'm actually not sure what the deal is with the case captioning
1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong @anthonypants
they're against trump in his capacity as president so idk. there are a number that are captioned as against DHS too
1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
does it make sense to sue the president like that, even if it is trump?
1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @anthonypants
well they're suing to get the executive order ruled illegal, and the EO is from the president...
1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong @anthonypants
the executive branch often gets sued, and the case caption sometimes then includes the president's name as the defendant
1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong @anthonypants
i'm just not sure why some are against trump and others are against DHS / united states etc
1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
as someone who doesn't know law it seems like it would make more sense to sue the government instead of the individual
1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @anthonypants
it's the president in his capacity as the president. similarly some famous case captions involve the AG's name
1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong @anthonypants
ACLU v. Reno (internet censorship), Eldred v. Ashcroft (copyright), Humanitarian Law Project v. Holder (terrorist designation)
1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime
the obamacare supreme court decision was NFIB v. Sebelius, against Sebelius in her capacity as Sec of HHS
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.