Mostly caught up with the dockets yesterday, new newsletter today. Will try to get another update out this weekend https://tinyletter.com/airports/letters/sorry-sorry-i-m-trying-to-delete-it-the-airport-cases-episode-4 …
they're against trump in his capacity as president so idk. there are a number that are captioned as against DHS too
-
-
does it make sense to sue the president like that, even if it is trump?
-
well they're suing to get the executive order ruled illegal, and the EO is from the president...
-
the executive branch often gets sued, and the case caption sometimes then includes the president's name as the defendant
-
i'm just not sure why some are against trump and others are against DHS / united states etc
-
as someone who doesn't know law it seems like it would make more sense to sue the government instead of the individual
-
it's the president in his capacity as the president. similarly some famous case captions involve the AG's name
-
ACLU v. Reno (internet censorship), Eldred v. Ashcroft (copyright), Humanitarian Law Project v. Holder (terrorist designation)
-
the obamacare supreme court decision was NFIB v. Sebelius, against Sebelius in her capacity as Sec of HHS
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.