Just watch for how the journalists you follow instantly & mindlessly classify as Fact every news report quoting an anonymous intel official.
-
-
That's true of every act of journalism. But I inform, *not* decide what NSA programs continue. Courts & public decide that.
- 1 réponse de plus
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
There was a context to that tweet that several people tore it out of. Have you looked at it?
-
I have, and I still think you've painted yourself into a corner for no good reason here.
-
I support whistleblowing. I oppose CIA/NSA subversion in secret. There is no tension, let alone contradiction, of any kind.
-
Agree no tension Just prudent for media to employ appropriate skepticism and due diligence on intel leaks.
-
Couldn't agree more with that. Also, that's exactly the opposite of what's happening.
- 1 réponse de plus
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
who exactly is "the public" and how can they possibly decide against releasing anything once everyone knows the info
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
I see IC response as key(often). Whistleblowing == strong critical response by IC. Propaganda "leak" == no criticism
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.