En banc in the 9th Circuit means that instead of a 3 judge panel, you get an 11 judge panel that supersedes the first panel's decision
-
-
En réponse à @sarahjeong
If it goes en banc, then instead of continuing on in the district court, the 3 judge panel decision gets set aside. 11 judge panel decides.
3 réponses 7 Retweets 19 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
and then, uh, we see what happens next, since this shitshow has very low predictability
6 réponses 5 Retweets 48 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
sarah jeong a retweeté Jim Tyre
sarah jeong ajouté,
1 réponse 1 Retweet 8 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
& you learn something new every day. Would that be a 25-judge or 27-judge bench? Would they rent an arena for oral arguments?pic.twitter.com/tOoRkcGsF7
1 réponse 1 Retweet 4 j'aime -
En réponse à @skyywise
apparently it's literally never happened but yeah it's an incredible fact
2 réponses 0 Retweet 4 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
that seems like a fallback created in case someone ever successfully argues the 9th Cir limited en banc is inadequate.
1 réponse 0 Retweet 2 j'aime -
En réponse à @skyywise @sarahjeong
I want a 27-judge bench to happen now. Assume they hear it in WA, where in Seattle or Olympia sh/could they hold Court?
2 réponses 0 Retweet 2 j'aime -
En réponse à @skyywise
they can hear it anywhere, given capacities, San Francisco or Pasadena would make more sense
1 réponse 0 Retweet 3 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
Well sure, but that's reasonable. If going Full Ninth, go ridiculous, like in the Space Needle.
1 réponse 1 Retweet 12 j'aime
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.