I have never fucking heard of a TRO being magically turned into a PI but that may be what happens here? Is this just my inexperience or wtf
-
-
-
En réponse à @sarahjeong
Letter from WA last night, plus order today asking for further briefing on exactly the question, "What the ever loving fuck is this case?"pic.twitter.com/pZpmNY7ASM
3 réponses 11 Retweets 59 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
This procedural stance is making my eye twitch. It's like seeing a cafe table that's misaligned with the wall.
4 réponses 0 Retweet 35 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
sarah jeong a retweeté Joe Palazzolo
WHAT THE FUCK IS THIS CASEhttps://twitter.com/joe_palazzolo/status/830188347918266368 …
sarah jeong ajouté,
4 réponses 27 Retweets 67 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
(sua sponte request en banc—the court calling for en banc on its own—is very rare)
7 réponses 14 Retweets 30 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
En banc in the 9th Circuit means that instead of a 3 judge panel, you get an 11 judge panel that supersedes the first panel's decision
3 réponses 8 Retweets 25 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
If it goes en banc, then instead of continuing on in the district court, the 3 judge panel decision gets set aside. 11 judge panel decides.
3 réponses 7 Retweets 19 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
and then, uh, we see what happens next, since this shitshow has very low predictability
6 réponses 5 Retweets 48 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
Don't forget, 10 of those 9th C judges are chosen by lot! And won't include Senior Judges Canby & Clifton who were on the panel?pic.twitter.com/LS2xqklqBY
1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime
senior judges can opt to be part of the pool, they're not automatically part of the pool
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.