If you're a lawyer please chime in here, but I think this means WA is now going to seek an actual preliminary injunction?
-
-
If it goes en banc, then instead of continuing on in the district court, the 3 judge panel decision gets set aside. 11 judge panel decides.
-
and then, uh, we see what happens next, since this shitshow has very low predictability
-
& you learn something new every day. Would that be a 25-judge or 27-judge bench? Would they rent an arena for oral arguments?pic.twitter.com/tOoRkcGsF7
-
apparently it's literally never happened but yeah it's an incredible fact
-
that seems like a fallback created in case someone ever successfully argues the 9th Cir limited en banc is inadequate.
-
I want a 27-judge bench to happen now. Assume they hear it in WA, where in Seattle or Olympia sh/could they hold Court?
-
they can hear it anywhere, given capacities, San Francisco or Pasadena would make more sense
- 2 réponses de plus
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
or as I found out yesterday they can apparently theoretically convene all 29 judges, which would be a fittingly ridiculous end
-
judicial voltron
-
I'll form the left kneecap
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.