Also it means we depart from the extremely weird procedural stance of contesting a temporary restraining order, and go back to the case.
-
-
En réponse à @sarahjeong
If you're a lawyer please chime in here, but I think this means WA is now going to seek an actual preliminary injunction?
10 réponses 1 Retweet 34 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
(Which they will get, lol). And then the case moves on to MOTD or whatever?
3 réponses 0 Retweet 23 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
IANALs are temporarily banned from my mentions
4 réponses 0 Retweet 108 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
OK info I'm gathering is that the answer to this question is: depends on what the judge says next
2 réponses 0 Retweet 20 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
I have never fucking heard of a TRO being magically turned into a PI but that may be what happens here? Is this just my inexperience or wtf
1 réponse 0 Retweet 23 j'aime -
-
En réponse à @sarahjeong
Letter from WA last night, plus order today asking for further briefing on exactly the question, "What the ever loving fuck is this case?"pic.twitter.com/pZpmNY7ASM
3 réponses 11 Retweets 59 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
This procedural stance is making my eye twitch. It's like seeing a cafe table that's misaligned with the wall.
4 réponses 0 Retweet 35 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
Think it may be a calculated way to delay the appeals process until after Gorsuch is seated?
1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.