This means the substantive case, rather than the procedural one. In other words, whether this actually violates the Constitution,
-
-
WHAT THE FUCK IS THIS CASEhttps://twitter.com/joe_palazzolo/status/830188347918266368 …
-
(sua sponte request en banc—the court calling for en banc on its own—is very rare)
-
En banc in the 9th Circuit means that instead of a 3 judge panel, you get an 11 judge panel that supersedes the first panel's decision
-
If it goes en banc, then instead of continuing on in the district court, the 3 judge panel decision gets set aside. 11 judge panel decides.
-
and then, uh, we see what happens next, since this shitshow has very low predictability
-
& you learn something new every day. Would that be a 25-judge or 27-judge bench? Would they rent an arena for oral arguments?pic.twitter.com/tOoRkcGsF7
-
apparently it's literally never happened but yeah it's an incredible fact
- 5 réponses de plus
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
Think it may be a calculated way to delay the appeals process until after Gorsuch is seated?
- Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
It is a shitshow. Didn't delve too deeply into it because yay, win, but yeah it all over the place.
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
its posture is out of alignment
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.