"Merits" just means that they're going to defend the case "on the merits"https://twitter.com/CNBCnow/status/830174089767690243 …
-
-
En réponse à @sarahjeong
This means the substantive case, rather than the procedural one. In other words, whether this actually violates the Constitution,
2 réponses 10 Retweets 58 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
rather than whether Washington state is, as a state, capable of suing the federal government over this, etc.
3 réponses 9 Retweets 42 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
Also it means we depart from the extremely weird procedural stance of contesting a temporary restraining order, and go back to the case.
2 réponses 3 Retweets 48 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
If you're a lawyer please chime in here, but I think this means WA is now going to seek an actual preliminary injunction?
10 réponses 1 Retweet 34 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
probably, but I think the idea is to get past that, since the “balance of harms” & so on is not relevant at the merits stage
2 réponses 0 Retweet 1 j'aime -
En réponse à @bergmayer
right, govt wants to get that part over with, but that's what's next in the pipeline, yes?
1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
yes in a normal case where the non-appealable TRO was T and wasn’t just appealed
1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime
yeah, I think this is going to be up to the judge
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.