"Merits" just means that they're going to defend the case "on the merits"https://twitter.com/CNBCnow/status/830174089767690243 …
-
-
OK info I'm gathering is that the answer to this question is: depends on what the judge says next
-
I have never fucking heard of a TRO being magically turned into a PI but that may be what happens here? Is this just my inexperience or wtf
-
What the ever loving fuck is this case?
-
Letter from WA last night, plus order today asking for further briefing on exactly the question, "What the ever loving fuck is this case?"pic.twitter.com/pZpmNY7ASM
-
This procedural stance is making my eye twitch. It's like seeing a cafe table that's misaligned with the wall.
-
WHAT THE FUCK IS THIS CASEhttps://twitter.com/joe_palazzolo/status/830188347918266368 …
-
(sua sponte request en banc—the court calling for en banc on its own—is very rare)
-
En banc in the 9th Circuit means that instead of a 3 judge panel, you get an 11 judge panel that supersedes the first panel's decision
-
If it goes en banc, then instead of continuing on in the district court, the 3 judge panel decision gets set aside. 11 judge panel decides.
-
and then, uh, we see what happens next, since this shitshow has very low predictability
- 7 réponses de plus
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
I would think the admin could still litigate standing too, and can't understand why they wouldn't.
-
I'm extrapolating this based on the CNBC breaking news.
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
there's my answer
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
IANAL which is why I read you & others who know what they’re talking about
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.