"Merits" just means that they're going to defend the case "on the merits"https://twitter.com/CNBCnow/status/830174089767690243 …
-
-
IANALs are temporarily banned from my mentions
-
OK info I'm gathering is that the answer to this question is: depends on what the judge says next
-
I have never fucking heard of a TRO being magically turned into a PI but that may be what happens here? Is this just my inexperience or wtf
-
What the ever loving fuck is this case?
-
Letter from WA last night, plus order today asking for further briefing on exactly the question, "What the ever loving fuck is this case?"pic.twitter.com/pZpmNY7ASM
-
This procedural stance is making my eye twitch. It's like seeing a cafe table that's misaligned with the wall.
-
WHAT THE FUCK IS THIS CASEhttps://twitter.com/joe_palazzolo/status/830188347918266368 …
-
(sua sponte request en banc—the court calling for en banc on its own—is very rare)
-
En banc in the 9th Circuit means that instead of a 3 judge panel, you get an 11 judge panel that supersedes the first panel's decision
-
If it goes en banc, then instead of continuing on in the district court, the 3 judge panel decision gets set aside. 11 judge panel decides.
-
and then, uh, we see what happens next, since this shitshow has very low predictability
- 7 réponses de plus
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
PIs are immediately appealable, so would go up again after PI ruling.
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
this is my take… a big reason to go through PI process is appealability but we're not doing that again so let's get down to it?
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.