What do you do when you can't fire your client, but also your client is Donald Trump? You get the behavior you're getting now.
-
-
I've had people suggest to me that the per curiam opinion is really a 2-1, but since there's no dissent, can that really be the case?
-
Ultimately Clifton has chosen to give this one his stamp of approval
-
This wasn't really an ultra-liberal panel, and the district court judge wasn't a liberal judge either.
-
9th Circuit is certainly known for skewing more liberal than the rest of the country, but citing that here is a pretty shallow analysis
-
District court judge in Washington is a Bush appointee. 9th Cir's Clifton is a Bush appointee. Canby is Carter, but sits in Arizona.
-
Four key takeaways from the 9th circuit decision today at
@just_securityhttps://www.justsecurity.org/37588/4-quick-thoughts-9th-circuit-order/ … -
A understated and measured response to a very silly contention https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2017/02/10/thoughts-on-the-appellate-court-ruling-against-trumps-refugee-order/ …pic.twitter.com/gbcq8URmPL
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
Because they're senior, neither Canby nor Clifton would be eligible if it goes en banc
-
interesting. is that how it works?
-
Yes, only active judges (defined to not include senior) eligible for en banc
-
I'm looking at the rules, unless what i'm reading is outdated, senior judges can opt to be eligible
-
What rule are you looking at. I could be wrong, but pretty sure I'm right
- 1 réponse de plus
Nouvelle conversation -
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.
sell