There's no point in questioning what deep game is being played by WH counsel or DOJ, either. It's clearly just an avoidant shitshow
-
-
Both Canby and Clifton are senior judges, and seemed more conservative than Friedland in oral arguments
-
I've had people suggest to me that the per curiam opinion is really a 2-1, but since there's no dissent, can that really be the case?
-
Ultimately Clifton has chosen to give this one his stamp of approval
-
This wasn't really an ultra-liberal panel, and the district court judge wasn't a liberal judge either.
-
9th Circuit is certainly known for skewing more liberal than the rest of the country, but citing that here is a pretty shallow analysis
-
District court judge in Washington is a Bush appointee. 9th Cir's Clifton is a Bush appointee. Canby is Carter, but sits in Arizona.
-
Four key takeaways from the 9th circuit decision today at
@just_securityhttps://www.justsecurity.org/37588/4-quick-thoughts-9th-circuit-order/ … -
A understated and measured response to a very silly contention https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2017/02/10/thoughts-on-the-appellate-court-ruling-against-trumps-refugee-order/ …pic.twitter.com/gbcq8URmPL
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
considering 45's comment re: "one of the judges" being unfair or whatever, that's my gut feeling, too
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.
sell