The president isn't acting like a president, he's acting like a pro se plaintiff
-
-
If Friedland (Obama appointee) did author the opinion, then Canby (Carter) and Clifton (Bush)-- are giving her cover.
-
Both Canby and Clifton are senior judges, and seemed more conservative than Friedland in oral arguments
-
I've had people suggest to me that the per curiam opinion is really a 2-1, but since there's no dissent, can that really be the case?
-
Ultimately Clifton has chosen to give this one his stamp of approval
-
This wasn't really an ultra-liberal panel, and the district court judge wasn't a liberal judge either.
-
9th Circuit is certainly known for skewing more liberal than the rest of the country, but citing that here is a pretty shallow analysis
-
District court judge in Washington is a Bush appointee. 9th Cir's Clifton is a Bush appointee. Canby is Carter, but sits in Arizona.
-
Four key takeaways from the 9th circuit decision today at
@just_securityhttps://www.justsecurity.org/37588/4-quick-thoughts-9th-circuit-order/ … -
A understated and measured response to a very silly contention https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2017/02/10/thoughts-on-the-appellate-court-ruling-against-trumps-refugee-order/ …pic.twitter.com/gbcq8URmPL
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
In light of the short time frame, isn't it just as likely that the opinion was written in chunks, and stitched together?
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.
sell