Friedland: Can you tell us anything about the type of evidence you'd present so we can decide if further proceedings are needed?
-
-
En réponse à @sarahjeong
Flentje: Not yet, but [rolls on forward with something else entirely]
3 réponses 9 Retweets 29 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
Clifton: Is there any legal authority as to the president or the council of the president can instruct departments on how to interpret order
1 réponse 11 Retweets 35 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
Clifton throwing shade on how badly the EO is written and basically subtweeting Bannon
2 réponses 70 Retweets 221 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
Sorry, I think he meant *counsel, not council
2 réponses 1 Retweet 14 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
Flentje, "If there are no further questions, I encourage the court to stay the injunction or limit it"
1 réponse 5 Retweets 11 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
The hearing is over. 9th Cir says they will issue a decision as soon as possible.
5 réponses 36 Retweets 38 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
LMAO before the telephone cut off you could hear Friedland go, "Soooo"
12 réponses 52 Retweets 299 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
Thanks everyone. If you enjoyed this and live in another jurisdiction, consider asking your circuit to follow the example of the 9th Cir
21 réponses 45 Retweets 255 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
lol, I just called the 4th Cir, there was a lady there working late & listening to 9th Cir!
2 réponses 2 Retweets 36 j'aime
you're doing the lord's work
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.