Spelling it out: It means 9th Circuit denies the government's request to stay the TRO, punts it back to district court
-
-
-
So then the temporary restraining order would stay in place and *the lawsuit would then proceed*
-
Very key here: This shit is NOWHERE near over
-
It's going to take just long enough that I can bust out some books and brush up on cases and give actually good commentary
-
Also there's lawsuits ALL OVER the damn country right now
-
Everything is moving 100x faster than it normally would, given the urgency of the situation. But courts are still courts
-
I guess what I'm saying is, the other branches of government, and protesting, all still matter
-
BTW, 9th circuit has created a public page with all the briefs, becaus 9th circuit does that for "cases of interest" https://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/content/view.php?pk_id=0000000860 …
-
again, 9th circuit best circuit
-
Federal Circuit https://twitter.com/Daniel22223333/status/829126348450971651 …
Ce Tweet est indisponible. -
easiest question anyone's ever asked me
- 1 réponse de plus
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
What's your prediction Sarah?
-
i agree with Tribe & Vladeck, though i think a unanimous in favor of WA is also plausible
-
what are you thinking?
-
2-1, at least, refusing on grounds record is inadequate, with possible narrowing of scope.
-
possible narrowing of scope, but I could only really hear Clifton pushing for it. likely to me that they won't discuss merits
- 1 réponse de plus
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
an open request to everyone: please stop predicting things please i beg you
-
But please keep inviting Giuliani to spill the beans on TV.
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.