i'd like to see a scholarly analysis but i don't think III.2 means Congress can cut things entirely from SCOTUS review.
it looks potentially ambiguous to me, but it would be absurd for SCOTUS to agree with King
-
-
Back in the Day™ my non-scientific polling of con law profs split slightly in favor of constricting pos
-
especially if they were more focused on history of the court rather than function
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
yes, though who knows what a judiciary-hobbling court would do if given the power to cripple themselves
-
we live in a post-common-sense world, so i'm not going to completely dismiss the possibility marbury gets overturned
-
the case Noah cited was post-Marbury and SCOTUS let itself get kneecapped so who is to say it's a conflict!
-
i want to die, pt. 100
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.