i'd like to see a scholarly analysis but i don't think III.2 means Congress can cut things entirely from SCOTUS review.
-
-
the structure would indicate an ability to expand original jurisdiction, not to cut out jurisdiction entirely.
-
it looks potentially ambiguous to me, but it would be absurd for SCOTUS to agree with King
-
Tweet indisponible
-
Back in the Day™ my non-scientific polling of con law profs split slightly in favor of constricting pos
-
especially if they were more focused on history of the court rather than function
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.