i am *so* disappointed that the brief does not flesh out the theory of tarnishment
-
-
En réponse à @sarahjeong
btw everyone who is writing about this, this isn't a lawsuit, it's an opposition at the USPTO. completely different legal status.
1 réponse 0 Retweet 15 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
*whispering furiously* it's not even the same branch of government
2 réponses 2 Retweets 51 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
the articles that say "a court will decide" make me cringe.
1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @travelingheidi
yes it's the worst. but that aside, how amazing is "dilution by tarnishment"
3 réponses 0 Retweet 5 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
it's really amazing (and! how much damage is done by a process that doesn't appear to properly review what bots recommend?)
1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @travelingheidi @sarahjeong
and how does the family not have a standard IP ownership/use process for all family to sign just to protect The Brand? I write--
1 réponse 0 Retweet 1 j'aime -
En réponse à @travelingheidi @sarahjeong
Recommended Use Agreements in my sleep. This feels like a massive oversight by one of their managers.
1 réponse 0 Retweet 1 j'aime -
En réponse à @travelingheidi
you know, until you mentioned it, it didn't occur to me that this was the lawyers acting automatically!
1 réponse 0 Retweet 2 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong @travelingheidi
mostly because the narrative is so hilarious in the context of that family's relationships
1 réponse 0 Retweet 1 j'aime
but also, how do you not have trademark lawyers that are familiar with the kardashian brand!!!!!! they should have known
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.