Juries presume the government's evidence is reliable and incorruptible. But uncomfortable facts bring to light a hard truth:https://twitter.com/sarahjeong/status/803746024317538304 …
-
-
En réponse à @Snowden
@sarahjeong@danielnazer how do we know that isn't just someone claiming to be a fed to DPR in an attempt to rip him off?3 réponses 0 Retweet 2 j'aime -
according to legal team, because he provided details about the investigation that were correct
2 réponses 1 Retweet 6 j'aime -
and not just another Force effort?
1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
Force was originally IDed as alpacino but that accusation drops out of later court filings
1 réponse 0 Retweet 2 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong @danielnazer et
presumably he pled to using many of the other aliases, but not to alpacino. no reason for him not to.
1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime
En réponse à @sarahjeong @danielnazer et
he copped to selling information under other aliases.
13:20 - 30 nov. 2016
0 réponse
0 Retweet
1 j'aime
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.