I don't believe for one second that anyone who was going to read the Trump story didn't because of Brangelina http://www.cjr.org/analysis/brangelina_trump_twitter.php?utm_content=buffer764f4&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=buffer …
-
-
En réponse à @sarahjeong
People neglect to read top news all the time because it simply doesn't interest them
2 réponses 1 Retweet 18 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
On a day that Brangelina didn't make news, that news story would have still gone unread by a lot of people
2 réponses 2 Retweets 14 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
And the same news story was read by lots of people despite Brangelina topping it
1 réponse 1 Retweet 8 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
A story about diverting funds from charitable foundations isn't competing for the same channel of interest as celebrity gossip
2 réponses 6 Retweets 26 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
Also, like, it's #100 in the list of bad shit Trump has done
4 réponses 0 Retweet 12 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
It's also weird to treat people as shallow for taking an interest in a genuinely surprising story over a completely unsurprising one
1 réponse 6 Retweets 28 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
Oh wow this story that changed people's perception of their world somehow did better than this story that did not
1 réponse 3 Retweets 10 j'aime
It's not like that audience hasn't been paying attention to Trump's bullshit for over a goddamn year
-
-
En réponse à @sarahjeong
And if they haven't, they weren't going to start on that day!
1 réponse 1 Retweet 6 j'aime - 1 réponse de plus
Nouvelle conversation -
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.