I don't believe for one second that anyone who was going to read the Trump story didn't because of Brangelina http://www.cjr.org/analysis/brangelina_trump_twitter.php?utm_content=buffer764f4&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=buffer …
-
-
On a day that Brangelina didn't make news, that news story would have still gone unread by a lot of people
-
And the same news story was read by lots of people despite Brangelina topping it
-
A story about diverting funds from charitable foundations isn't competing for the same channel of interest as celebrity gossip
-
Also, like, it's #100 in the list of bad shit Trump has done
-
It's also weird to treat people as shallow for taking an interest in a genuinely surprising story over a completely unsurprising one
-
Oh wow this story that changed people's perception of their world somehow did better than this story that did not
-
It's not like that audience hasn't been paying attention to Trump's bullshit for over a goddamn year
-
And if they haven't, they weren't going to start on that day!
- 1 réponse de plus
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
I think also that it is rational disinterest.
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.