Google says that even if there is a bad faith / willfulness requirement, you can find bad faith based on how Hurst reacted in court
-
-
En réponse à @sarahjeong
First, she "dissembled" after Van Nest objected; second, when she saw the reporter later, she didn't do anything
1 réponse 0 Retweet 1 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
Alsup asks why Ryu didn't certify civil contempt.
1 réponse 0 Retweet 1 j'aime -
-
En réponse à @sarahjeong
ALSUP: The newspapers come to all these hearings. You just assume there’s a newspaper person in this courtroom.
5 réponses 1 Retweet 13 j'aime -
-
En réponse à @sarahjeong
Google waves a piece of paper. "The protective order itself says that if you violate it, you can be subject to a finding of contempt."
2 réponses 3 Retweets 8 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
Oracle says that there was a "huge" amount of information to keep confidential and under seal.
2 réponses 0 Retweet 1 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
ORACLE: This was one arguable mistake made throughout the course of a very complex litigation.
4 réponses 0 Retweet 3 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
Alsup wraps up saying he owes his 11:00 calendar a hearing
1 réponse 0 Retweet 5 j'aime
sarah jeong a retweeté 🌅 🌄 eevee 🌄 🌅
During trial he said he wanted to take an iPhone panoramic photo of the courtroom lolhttps://twitter.com/eevee/status/779026001787432960 …
sarah jeong ajouté,
-
-
En réponse à @sarahjeong
Google worked so hard to keep the "Google information" and "Apple information" a secret but I found it by searching on, uh, Google
6 réponses 8 Retweets 36 j'aime - 1 réponse de plus
Nouvelle conversation -
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.