Google says that not only did Oracle disclose the confidential information in court, they also took no steps to limit the damage
-
-
En réponse à @sarahjeong
Namely, they didn't agree with Google when Google asked to seal the information at that very hearing, or in a letter to the court later
1 réponse 0 Retweet 4 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
sarah jeong a retweeté Tim Stone
In the brief they also blame Hurst for not telling the reporter to not report thathttps://twitter.com/tmslft/status/779012624881180673 …
sarah jeong ajouté,
1 réponse 0 Retweet 7 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
Attorney for Google says that "things happen" and "There but for the grace of God go I."
1 réponse 1 Retweet 4 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
GOOGLE: The answer is not to dispute that there was a problem, to refuse to cooperate, to refuse to take very simple steps to address it.
1 réponse 0 Retweet 5 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
Google adds, "This motion is not meant to punish anyone."
2 réponses 0 Retweet 3 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
Google says it's important for the court to clarify what the standard protective order for the Northern District of California actually does
1 réponse 0 Retweet 7 j'aime -
-
En réponse à @sarahjeong
GOOGLE: Google had to spend a significant amount of money to undo the effects of the disclosure.
3 réponses 0 Retweet 10 j'aime -
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.