ORACLE: [On January 14] there was an exchange between Judge Ryu and Ms Hurst that went on for at least ten pages.
-
-
Jan 20: Google files a motion for reconsideration.
-
Jan 21: Google's motion gets bounced because it's incorrectly filed.
-
Jan 21: Google refiles motion for reconsideration.
-
Jan 21: Oracle files saying they have no position.
-
Jan 21: Bloomberg publishes.
-
Jan 22: Ryu seals the transcript. Oracle tries to take credit for this by saying Ryu must have seen that Oracle "did not contest."
-
ORACLE: I submit to your honor that there’s no bad faith here.
-
Alsup is EXTREMELY salty right now
-
ALSUP: In my mind, she should never have done that.
-
ALSUP: I practiced 25 years... 17 years in this job. This is uniform practice in this district, in every district.
-
ALSUP: You tell the judge, I’d like to give you this, judge, but it's under this protective order... I need to hand you a copy.
-
ALSUP: If you were on the other side, you’d be jumping up and down about how they violated the protective order.
-
ALSUP: I think it's important for you to own up and admit that it’s a violation.
-
ORACLE: Even assuming it’s a violation of the protective order—
-
ALSUP: *exasperated noise*
-
ALSUP: Your firm is one of the biggest litigators in America.
-
ALSUP: Next time you go into a court somewhere and you ask for confidential documents I hope someone raises this.

-
ALSUP: You’re pushing me to the direction that I have to find bad faith.
-
ALSUP: A lawyer like Ms Hurst should have known she did the wrong thing immediately.
-
ALSUP: Ms. Hurst is very experienced and she would have been the first to make a motion. She knew she should not have done that.
-
ALSUP: She just blurted out the two numbers that mattered. She just blurted it out.
-
ALSUP: If she had had the recipe for Coca Cola she could have blurted it out in this court right now.
-
Oracle is trying to skirt around whether it's a violation but their point isn't w/r/t that, it's that a contempt finding is inappropriate
-
Oracle says that if Judge Ryu perceived civil contempt, she was required to certify it to the court. (She did not).
-
Oracle says that Hurst is here and is willing to speak to the court if the court would like her to.
-
Back to Google.
-
Google says that even if there is a bad faith / willfulness requirement, you can find bad faith based on how Hurst reacted in court
-
First, she "dissembled" after Van Nest objected; second, when she saw the reporter later, she didn't do anything
-
Alsup asks why Ryu didn't certify civil contempt.
-
Google says it's because Hurst made excuses.
- 9 réponses de plus
Nouvelle conversation -
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.