Alsup just warned attorneys that a lot of people are "out there" and to be careful not to say anything confidential
-
-
Melinda Haag for Oracle, not Annette Hurst (since Hurst is the attorney who blurted the info)
-
Oracle says this motion is asking the court to find "a respected trial attorney and her firm in contempt"
-
ORACLE: [On January 14] there was an exchange between Judge Ryu and Ms Hurst that went on for at least ten pages.
-
ORACLE: In the course of that back and forth, Ms Hurst revealed information, two numbers that are now the basis of this motion.
-
ORACLE: Google expressed no objection, no concern with the revelation of those two numbers.
-
ORACLE: Five days after the hearing, Google raised a concern for the first time about the revelation of the Google or Android number.
-
Oracle now turns to the "Apple information," which they say is a separate issue.
-
Note: the "Google number" is the Android revenue share, the "Apple number" is how much Google pays Apple to use the Google search bar.
-
-
At the time, Van Nest did object to the disclosure of the Apple information. At the time, Judge Ryu said she would rule on it later.
-
In the five days after the hearing, counsel met and conferred about the discovery request in general. They did not discuss Google/Apple info
-
On January 19th, Google asked Oracle to join them in asking for that part of the transcript to be sealed. They gave them until noon next day
-
At 3:30, before Oracle had a chance to respond, Judge Ryu ruled against Google's motion. So Oracle shrugged it off.
-
Jan 20: Google files a motion for reconsideration.
-
Jan 21: Google's motion gets bounced because it's incorrectly filed.
-
Jan 21: Google refiles motion for reconsideration.
-
Jan 21: Oracle files saying they have no position.
-
Jan 21: Bloomberg publishes.
-
Jan 22: Ryu seals the transcript. Oracle tries to take credit for this by saying Ryu must have seen that Oracle "did not contest."
-
ORACLE: I submit to your honor that there’s no bad faith here.
-
Alsup is EXTREMELY salty right now
-
ALSUP: In my mind, she should never have done that.
-
ALSUP: I practiced 25 years... 17 years in this job. This is uniform practice in this district, in every district.
-
ALSUP: You tell the judge, I’d like to give you this, judge, but it's under this protective order... I need to hand you a copy.
-
ALSUP: If you were on the other side, you’d be jumping up and down about how they violated the protective order.
-
ALSUP: I think it's important for you to own up and admit that it’s a violation.
-
ORACLE: Even assuming it’s a violation of the protective order—
-
ALSUP: *exasperated noise*
-
ALSUP: Your firm is one of the biggest litigators in America.
-
ALSUP: Next time you go into a court somewhere and you ask for confidential documents I hope someone raises this.

- 22 réponses de plus
Nouvelle conversation -
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.