i am a few minutes late as per usual but fortunately there are a few other cases ahead of Oracle v Google
-
-
-
dearly beloved, we are gathered here today becausepic.twitter.com/aYGEEbMjMk
-
now, what did oracle do to make google this mad? why do they want a finding of contempt + sanctions?
-
no it's not what you think
-
"during a discovery hearing before Magistrate Judge Ryu at which *at least one reporter was present*"pic.twitter.com/Vk7tSbvUPV
-
Google says that in January, Oracle attorney Annette Hurst disclosed confidential information in open court *where there were reporters*
-
-
now, you must be scratching your head trying to remember a massive embarrassing story about google that came out in january
-
-
And Oracle has portions of its brief straight up redactedpic.twitter.com/t8WHYZ9x5m
-
Ever wanted to see behind a mysterious redaction? Here ya go
-
Highly Confidential Information That Made Headlines Worldwide http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-01-22/google-paid-apple-1-billion-to-keep-search-bar-on-iphone …pic.twitter.com/w5X4WOQs10
-
This. This Bloomberg article is why we are back in court today.
-
Google wants Oracle to have to pay for the subsequent filings Google made in the aftermath of the disclosurepic.twitter.com/0ptLS8AvrF
-
These filings represent less than half a percent of all the filings in Oracle v. Google*
-
*Android source code joke
-
** actually it's probable that they literally do represent less than half a percent
-
*** what a world
-
what's amazing is that the article has been out since january and google and oracle still have to pretend like this is super sekrit
-
but even better, i don't remember this news cycle at all? i guess it did make the rounds though
-
To be clear, it was subject to a protective order!https://twitter.com/MarkJKings/status/778982471983505408 …
-
It only came up in court "in the heat of an argument" says Oraclepic.twitter.com/8ErKIpFEk4
-
My favorite quibble in this beef is over whether saying something in open court where a reporter is present is disclosing to the press
-
might be different in front of judge, but my impression from the filings is that Google is Very Mad and Oracle is Defensive and Embarrassed
-
omg they might clear the courtroom for the motion hearing because of the "sensitive information"
-
Still waiting for the case to come up. I've stepped out in the meantime to pursue valuable activitiespic.twitter.com/9bcZMBXB1N
-
ok we're on
-
Alsup just warned attorneys that a lot of people are "out there" and to be careful not to say anything confidential
-
Google says that not only did Oracle disclose the confidential information in court, they also took no steps to limit the damage
-
Namely, they didn't agree with Google when Google asked to seal the information at that very hearing, or in a letter to the court later
- 60 réponses de plus
Nouvelle conversation -
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.