Hurst says that Google's experts lied when they said Android was not on desktops and laptops.
-
-
Apparently Ars Technica said: "The shocker is that this is not based on Arc."
-
ORACLE: This was a SHOCK to the industry and to us.
-
ORACLE: Ars Technica, the premier publication in this industry, called it a shocker. SHOCKER.
-
I still think it's highly unlikely that there will be a new trial but yeah I think there were some curious decisions at Google I/O this year
-
ORACLE: The versions of Android are what are at issue. Where they put those versions don’t matter.
-
... ??? So do they or don't they???
-
ORACLE: The jury in the first case did not consider just phones and tablets. The jury form itself talked about java and android.
-
ORACLE: It was not a device specific trial.
-
ALSUP: We already said we’re going to have another trial on all of those other products.
-
Troll.
-
Now returning to the costs bill. Asks that they reach an agreement and send him a joint letter.
-
GOOGLE: We hope so, your Honor. ALSUP: Hope springs eternal.
-
We're done. Piece forthcoming.
-
I have some thoughts about the incredibly awkward timing of Google I/O.
-
Storify of today's motion hearing here: https://storify.com/sarahjeong/oracle-v-google-motion-for-a-new-trial …
-
i am very tempted to but also there's no way anyone wants to see any of thathttps://twitter.com/sarahjeong/status/765960176897667072 …
-
even if you think you do, you don't. just look at all the apple v. samsung litigation
- 1 réponse de plus
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
i missed this
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.