They disclosed ARC and in fact one of Oracle's experts devoted 17 paragraphs in his report to ARC.
-
-
I'm just sitting here trying to keep it together because this is amazing
-
i fully believed they would pull something out of their asses to prevent themselves from saying that
-
Oracle is saying that Arcwelder is not the same because in the announcement they said they threw it out and made a whole new thing.
-
GOOGLE: In public we refer to it as Google Play for Chromebooks.
-
Google bludgeons Oracle again for Jaffe's testimony, where he admitted he did not look into whether Java SE's market was harmed.
-
Google says that ARC is a little different from what they released but that it's ultimately the same because Chrome is the platform (hmm)
-
ALSUP: Don't each of these products have to be determined as fair use one at time?
-
Alsup asks how if so, collateral estoppel could even apply. Google says it depends on what the court of appeals says.
-
Sorry guys I don't know what's going on with collateral estoppel in this case re: this issue, I did ask around but it's really confusing
-
in case any of you guys were burning to hear what the collateral estoppel analysis in this case is
-
should I go to all the future Android product trials
-
Alsup on his previous ruling limiting timeline of evidence. "There’s no way to keep up with the industry, so you gotta try it in pieces."
-
ORACLE: They were perpetrating a fraud on the jury!!!
-
ALSUP: I don’t uh… I’m not following your point.
-
Alsup asks how it's possible to have limited the chronological scope of the trial and also admit this evidence.
-
Hurst says that Google's experts lied when they said Android was not on desktops and laptops.
-
Hurst throws her hands up. "It’s a fraud on the jury! It’s a mockery of the system!"
-
ORACLE: The trial was about Android through Marshmallow. By stipulation!
-
ORACLE: It was a total fraud for their witnesses to parade in here and say that it’s not on desktops and laptops.
-
ORACLE: ... and then on the day of close to say it’s on every laptop and desktop.
-
Google says that ARC on Chrome OS uses fewer of the infringing APIs than Android does [?] and that it cuts against Oracle's own case.
-
Oracle now reading out snippets of Astrachan's testimony & Van Nest closing argument
-
Hurst throws up arms again and starts shouting, "This is outrageous! They’re lying to the jury!
-
Alsup asks why she didn't bring up what she knew about Arc earlier.
-
ORACLE: What Anderson is saying is you’re putting on a pretty good act. ... What do you have to say to that?
-
Hurst now reading an Ars Technica article out loud.
-
Apparently Ars Technica said: "The shocker is that this is not based on Arc."
-
ORACLE: This was a SHOCK to the industry and to us.
-
ORACLE: Ars Technica, the premier publication in this industry, called it a shocker. SHOCKER.
- 16 réponses de plus
Nouvelle conversation -
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.