According to the briefings, Oracle is mad because during discovery, Google did not produce evidence regarding desktop Android
-
-
ORACLE: That whole foundation is gone. ... It’s not transformative now because it’s on desktops and laptops.
-
ORACLE: The market analysis of how harm didn’t occur is all gone now because it’s on desktops and laptops.
-
Hurst quotes from the announcement at I/O.
-
“I’m super excited to be here b/c I can finally tell you what we’ve been working on for the last few months so it’s not a secret anymore."
-
Hurst emphasis "months" and "secret."
-
Google will be arguing that they did disclose by disclosing a project called "arcwelder." Oracle says arcwelder is not the same.
-
Oracle points to the announcement itself, which refers to it as "a whole new platform."
-
Google says ARC was the same (App Runtime for Chrome) -- allowed Android apps to run on Chrome OS devices.
-
They disclosed ARC and in fact one of Oracle's experts devoted 17 paragraphs in his report to ARC.
-
Google says that Oracle already tried to bring ARC and other products into it, and that the court struck testimony about these products.
-
All of these products were created after the first trial. This limited retrial was frozen in time, looking at what was available in 2012.
-
Products include later implementations, Android TV, Android Wear, Android Auto.
-
ALSUP: Do you concede that Oracle is entitled to bring a new lawsuit against any new product that was not in the first trial?
-
GOOGLE: [Collateral estoppel issues aside], Yes.
-
I just died
-
I died
- 1 réponse de plus
Nouvelle conversation -
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.